UDK 681.3:519.68

“Intelligent Analysis of Information” Conference
Paper Title

Smith S., ScD, Johnson J. J., PhD, Brown B.,
Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv, johnson@kpi.uа

Abstract cannot exceed 6–7 lines. Typically, the following phrases are used: “in the paper, … are defined,” “data on … are presented,” “results of … are shown.” To format each paper section, headings, subheadings, and other objects, one can use this document as “Document Template,” or use “Style” menu item (“Format” → “Style”) for a given text element.

Introduction

Introduction has to contain concise problem definition, short overview of related work, the topicality of the task being solved needs to substantiated. In the introduction, the main idea of the paper, obtained results, and further research are briefly outlined.

Section Title

Subsection Title

Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text.

References are typeset in the text as a source number in brackets. References are numbered in the order of appearance in the text.

Equations are typeset using MS Word equation editor (version 2014 or newer) with parameters corresponding to equations that follow.

Example of equation formatting. Let, as in [3], a finite set of objects , , , be given for examination. Each object is characterized by a finite set of measures , ; .

,	(1)

where ….

We obtain a group of experts , ; . Each expert independently of others provides an estimate of each quality measure , , for an object , , as a certain quantity .

Figures must be given only in .jpg, .png, or .tif formats (black and white, 300 dpi). Text in figures should be in Times New Roman font, 8–12 pt. Each figure must have a caption (see examples below).

Fig. 1. UML activity diagram of Delphi method

Fig. 2. First expert estimate (median)	Fig. 3. Second expert estimate
(outside confidence set)

An example of formatted table is given below (see table 1).

Table 1. Estimating objects degree of similarity

implementation level	objects degree of similarity
quality
measure	lowest	low	medium	high	highest
highest
chosen
[0.8;1.0]
high
[0.6;0.8]
medium
[0.4;0.6]
low
chosen
chosen
[0.2;0.4]
lowest	chosen
chosen	[0.0;0.2]

[0.0;0.2]

[0.2;0.4]

[0.4;0.6]

[0.6;0.8]

[0.8;1.0]	quality
measure

Paper Submission Guidelines

A file with the paper must be sent via email to temnikova_elena@ukr.net. The paper should be submitted both in .doc (.docx) and .pdf formats. Paper file should be named by the last name of one of the co-authors.

Conclusions

Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text. Normal text.

References

1.	Лефевр В. А. Конфликтующие структуры / В. А. Лефевр. — М. : Институт психологии РАН, 2001. — 136 с.

2.	Лефевр В. Алгебра совести / В. Лефевр. — М. : Когито-центр, 2003. — 426 с.

3.	Adams-Webber J. Self-Reflexion in Evaluating Others / J. Adams-Webber // American Journal of Psychology. — 1997. — 110. — P. 527–541.

4.	Лепский В. Е. Рефлексивное управление в тоталитарных сектах / В. Е. Лепский, А. М. Степанов // Рефлексивное управление. Сб. статей. — М. : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2000. — С. 122–133.

5.	Таран Т. А. Булевы модели рефлексивного управления в ситуации выбора / Т. А. Таран // Автоматика и телемеханика. — 2001. — №10. — С. 103–117.

6.	Таран Т. А. Модель рефлексивного поведения в конфликтной ситуации / Т. А. Таран // Изв. РАН. Теория и системы управления. — 1998. — №1. — С. 156–165.

Шаблон ИАИ-2004

Dan

2017-01-21

priwat